New Year's Resolutions: A Strategic Blueprint for Boards and C-Suite Executives in the Food & Beverage Industry
Debbie Morrison • January 7, 2024

The advent of a new year often brings with it the tradition of setting resolutions, a practice that extends into the professional realm, particularly for leaders in dynamic sectors like the Food & Beverage industry. For boards and C-suite executives, 2024 presents an unprecedented opportunity to redefine leadership and organisational goals through the lens of micro-resolutions - small, manageable changes that can lead to significant outcomes.


Embracing Micro-Resolutions for Personal Growth

Why Start Small?

In an industry as fast-paced and ever-evolving as Food & Beverage, large, sweeping resolutions can often be daunting and less feasible. This is where micro-resolutions come in. They are about making small, incremental changes that are easier to stick to and can lead to larger, more sustainable impacts over time.


What Can Executives Do?

Boards and C-suite executives should start by identifying key areas for personal growth and professional development. This could range from enhancing industry knowledge, improving leadership skills, or adopting new technology trends. The key is to break these down into smaller, actionable steps. For instance, instead of broadly aiming to 'improve leadership skills', set a micro-resolution to 'mentor a team member bi-weekly'.


Staying on Track

Regular self-assessment is crucial. Executives should schedule monthly check-ins to evaluate their progress and make adjustments as needed. This approach ensures that resolutions are adaptable and aligned with evolving personal and professional landscapes.


Setting Teams Up for Success

Fostering a Culture of Continuous Improvement

Leaders in the Food & Beverage industry must also focus on setting their teams up for success. This involves creating an environment that encourages continuous learning and improvement.


How to Achieve This?

  • Promote Skill Development: Encourage team members to set their own micro-resolutions focused on skill development. This could be learning a new software, enhancing customer service skills, or understanding the latest food safety regulations.
  • Create Collaborative Goals: Align team micro-resolutions with broader organisational objectives. For instance, if a company's goal is to reduce waste, a team micro-resolution could be to implement a new recycling program.

The Role of Feedback

Regular feedback is essential. Leaders should provide constructive feedback to help team members stay on track with their micro-resolutions and recognize their achievements, thereby fostering a positive and motivated workforce.


Aligning New Opportunities with Micro-Goals

Assessing Leadership Opportunities

For executives considering new job opportunities, aligning these with micro-goals is vital. This approach allows for a more strategic assessment of whether a new role aligns with personal and professional objectives.


Key Considerations:

  • Cultural Fit: Does the organisation's culture align with your values?
  • Growth Opportunities: Are there opportunities for professional development that align with your micro-resolutions?
  • Impact Potential: Can you make a meaningful impact in this role?

Making the Decision

Before making a move, leaders should evaluate the potential role against their set micro-resolutions. If the opportunity advances these goals, it can be a strong indicator that the role is a good fit.


Supporting Staff Development with Micro-Goals

Nurturing Talent in the Food & Beverage Industry

The Food & Beverage industry is highly competitive, and retaining top talent is crucial for success. Executives can play a key role in this by supporting the professional development of their staff through micro-goals.


How to Implement:

  • Individual Development Plans: Work with team members to create personalised development plans that include micro-resolutions.
  • Learning Opportunities: Provide resources and opportunities for learning, such as workshops, seminars, or online courses relevant to the Food & Beverage industry.

Ensuring Optimal Performance

To ensure optimal performance, executives should regularly monitor the progress of these development plans and adjust as necessary. Recognizing and rewarding achievements related to these micro-goals can also significantly boost morale and productivity.


Conclusion: A Year of Transformation

As we step into 2024, the emphasis for boards and C-suite executives in the Food & Beverage industry should be on flexibility, adaptability, and continuous improvement. By setting and pursuing micro-resolutions, leaders can not only enhance their own professional growth but also drive their teams and organisations towards greater success.


By John Elliott June 26, 2025
You don’t hear about it on the nightly news. There’s no breaking story. No panic. No protests. Just rows of vegetables being pulled out of the ground with no plan to replant. Just farmers who no longer believe there’s a future for them here. Just quiet decisions — to sell, to walk away, to stop. And if you ask around the industry, they’ll tell you the same thing: It’s not just one bad season. It’s a slow death by a thousand margins. 1 in 3 growers are preparing to leaveIn September 2024, AUSVEG released a national sentiment report with a statistic that should have set off alarms in every capital city: 34% of Australian vegetable growers were considering exiting the industry in the next 12 months. Another one-third said they’d leave if offered a fair price for their farm. Source: AUSVEG Industry Sentiment Report 2024 (PDF) These aren’t abstract hypotheticals. These are real decisions, already in motion. For many, it’s not about profitability anymore, it’s about survival. This isn’t burnout. It’s entrapment. Behind the numbers are people whose entire identity is tied to a profession that no longer feeds them. Many are asset-rich but cash-poor. They own the land. But the land owns them back. Selling means walking away from decades of history. Staying means bleeding capital, month by month, in a system where working harder delivers less. Every year, input costs rise, fuel, fertiliser, compliance. But the farmgate price doesn’t move. Or worse, it drops. Retail World Magazine reports that even though national vegetable production increased 3% in 2023–24, the total farmgate value fell by $140 million. Growers produced more and earned less. That’s not a market. That’s a trap. What no one wants to say aloud The truth is this: many growers are only staying because they can’t leave. If you’re deep in debt, if your farm is tied to multi-generational ownership, if you’ve invested everything in equipment, infrastructure, or land access, walking away isn’t easy. It’s a last resort. So instead, you stay. You cut your hours. Delay maintenance. Avoid upgrades. Cancel the next round of planting. You wait for something to shift, interest rates, weather, prices and you pretend that waiting is strategy. According to the latest fruitnet.com survey, over 50% of vegetable growers say they’re financially worse off than a year ago. And nearly 40% expect conditions to deteriorate further. This isn’t about optimism or resilience. It’s about dignity and the quiet erosion of it. Supermarkets won’t save them, and they never planned to In the current model, supermarket pricing doesn’t reflect real-world farm economics. Retailers demand year-round consistency, aesthetic perfection, and lower prices. They don’t absorb rising input costs, they externalise them. They offer promotions funded not by their marketing budgets, but by the growers’ margins. Farmers take the risk. Retailers take the profit. And because the power imbalance is so deeply entrenched, there’s no real negotiation, just quiet coercion dressed up as "category planning." Let’s talk about what’s actually broken This isn’t just a market failure. It’s a policy failure. Australia’s horticulture system has been built on: Decades of deregulated wholesale markets Lack of collective bargaining power for growers Retailer consolidation that has created a virtual duopoly Export-focused incentives that bypass smaller domestic producers There’s no meaningful floor price for key produce lines. No national enforcement of fair dealing. No public database that links supermarket shelf price to farmgate return. Which means growers, like James, can be driven into loss-making supply contracts without ever seeing the true economics of their product downstream. But the real silence? It’s from consumers. Here’s what no one wants to admit: We say we care about “buying local.” We say we value the farmer’s role. We share those viral posts about strawberries going unsold or milk prices being unfair. And then we complain about a $4 lettuce. We opt for the cheapest bag of carrots. We walk past the "imperfect" produce bin. We frown at the cost of organic and click “Add to Cart” on whatever’s half price. We’re not just bystanders. We’re part of the equation. What happens when the growers go? At first, very little. Supermarkets will find substitutes. Importers will fill gaps. Large agribusinesses will expand into spaces vacated by smaller players. Prices will stay low, until they don’t. But over time, we’ll notice: Produce that travels further and lasts less. Fewer independent growers at farmer’s markets. Entire regions losing their growing identity. National food security becoming a campaign promise instead of a reality. And when the climate throws something serious at us, drought, flood, global supply shock, we’ll realise how little resilience we’ve preserved. So what do we do? We start by telling the truth. Australia is not food secure. Not if 1 in 3 growers are planning to exit. The market isn’t working. Not when prices rise at the shelf and fall at the farmgate. The solution isn’t scale. It’s fairness, visibility, and rebalancing power. That means: Mandating cost-reflective contracts between retailers and suppliers Enabling collective bargaining rights for growers Building transparent data systems linking production costs to consumer prices Introducing transition finance for smaller producers navigating reform and climate pressure And holding supermarkets publicly accountable for margin extraction But more than anything, it means recognising what we’re losing, before it's gone. Final word If you ate a vegetable today, it likely came from someone who’s considered giving up in the past year. Not because they don’t care. But because caring doesn’t pay. This isn’t about nostalgia. It’s about sovereignty, over what we eat, how we grow it, and who gets to stay in the system.  Because the next time you see rows of green stretching to the horizon, you might want to ask: How many of these fields are already planning their last harvest?
By John Elliott June 20, 2025
If you're leading an FMCG or food manufacturing business right now, you're probably still talking about growth. Your board might be chasing headcount approvals. Your marketing team’s pitching a new brand campaign. Your category team’s assuming spend will bounce. But your customer? They’ve already moved on. Quietly. Like they always do. The illusion of resilience FMCG has always felt protected, “essential” by nature. People still eat, wash, shop. It’s easy to assume downturns pass around us, not through us. But this isn’t 2020. Recessions in 2025 won’t look like lockdowns. They’ll look like volume drops that no promo can fix. Shrinking margins on products that no longer carry their premium. Quiet shelf deletions you weren’t warned about. The data’s already there. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, consumer spending is slowing in real terms , even as inflation eases. The Reserve Bank confirmed in May: household consumption remains subdued amid weak real income growth . And over 80% of Australians have cut back on discretionary food spending , according to Finder. They’re still shopping, just not like they used to. A managing director at a national food manufacturer told me recently: “We won a new product listing in April. By July, it was marked for deletion. The velocity wasn’t there, but neither was the shopper. We’d forecasted like 2022 never ended. Rookie mistake.” That one stuck with me. Because I’ve heard it before, just in different words.