Divided opinions needn’t mean a fractured workplace
Debbie Morrison • January 28, 2021

Divided opinions needn’t mean a fractured workplace


Diversity. It’s typically one of the greatest strengths of a thriving business. Yet while differences in skills, backgrounds and opinions can often be harnessed to great effect, inevitably some issues are so fundamental they can instead create tension and conflict, turning a smooth-running workplace into anything but for Senior Executives and HR Managers.


There’s arguably no better example than the debate that surrounded the Same-Sex Marriage postal survey undertaken by the Australian Bureau of Statistics on behalf of the Australian Government in 2017. Whatever your personal stance, it begged the question: how do you best manage workplace conflicts that arise from such polarising issues?


All opinions should be heard.

In ELR Executive’s experience, a significant obstacle to an open and honest workplace occurs when staff members feel they’re being ignored – either overtly or through a perceived pressure to remain quiet – regardless of the issue in question. Being heard by senior managers and having the confidence to speak up are essential to feeling accepted and respected by both your colleagues and management. Others may disagree with your perspective, and they have every right to do so. But when you feel you aren’t being listened to, or at least granted fair opportunity to express your views in the workplace, trouble can quickly begin to brew. Previously productive team members can become disgruntled, disruptive and disillusioned. Worse still, they may just up and leave creating an even bigger HR problem.


Loud doesn’t always mean right.

Of course, there’s an important difference between being heard and ramming your opinion down the throats of everyone within earshot. The squeaky wheel may get the oil, but it doesn’t mean it’s any more deserving than the others. Senior managers and HR Departments should be alert to this. In particular, be wary of domineering staff members who are overtly vocal (or even hostile) on polarising issues or move quickly to shut down and ridicule those who share different views. It can border on workplace intimidation and potentially drive an irreparable wedge between team members that could undermine years of team building and far outlive the issue in contention itself.


Management by objective.

It’s human nature to choose sides. But effective HR management may require you to rise above personal opinions for the greater good of your team – especially when emotions are running high. Rather than becoming bogged down in ‘us versus them’ scenarios, always consider the broader business objectives and use them as your compass, just as you would normally.


​ Agreeing to disagree.

Consensus is great in theory. But when emotionally-charged issues are at play (even something as innocuous as the refereeing during the football finals could trigger problems in some workplaces!), it can be an idealistic and unattainable goal. No matter how respectful the debate may be, common ground may never be achieved between some team members. Typically, the only way to move on is to encourage the parties to respect each other’s right to hold their opinion. In other words, agreeing to disagree.


​ R-E-S-P-E-C-T.

Ultimately a harmonious workplace is a respectful one. It’s an environment where all team members feel they have the right to speak up and be heard, without fear or favour from their colleagues or managers. Achieve that and you’ll be well on your way to ensuring contentious issues such as the debate that surrounded the Same-Sex Marriage postal survey don’t weaken your team or undermine professional relationships. In fact, display strong and respectful leadership and they may even provide an opportunity to strengthen them.


A Farmer walking through a barn, using a laptop with cows eating hay nearby.
By John Elliott April 17, 2025
Australia’s meat sector is facing a leadership vacuum. Explore the hidden crisis behind staffing, succession, and ESG risk in food manufacturing.
By John Elliott April 6, 2025
Comfort has become the silent killer of executive performance. In an era defined by disruption, volatility, and shrinking margins, too many leadership teams are still optimising for control, not adaptability. They talk about transformation, but build cultures of stability. They prize clarity, yet avoid the ambiguity where real growth lives. The problem isn’t capability. It’s discomfort intolerance. The solution? Start hiring and promoting leaders who deliberately seek discomfort—not just those who can tolerate it when it arrives. Growth Mindset Isn’t Enough Anymore You’ve heard the term "growth mindset" countless times. It’s become a leadership cliché. But it’s not wrong—it’s just incomplete. A growth mindset says, "I believe I can learn." Discomfort-driven leadership says, "I will actively seek out the hardest experiences because that’s where I’ll grow fastest." The distinction matters. Leaders with a growth mindset tend to thrive when external change forces them to adapt. But leaders who embrace discomfort create those conditions on purpose. They invite hard feedback. They question their own success. They take action before external pressure arrives. According to a 2023 study by Deloitte, only 22% of executives say their leadership team is “very prepared” for the future—despite record spending on transformation programmes (Deloitte Human Capital Trends, 2023). That gap exists because most teams are trained to manage change , not lead into uncertainty . Ask yourself: Are you hiring leaders who wait for disruption—or ones who walk towards it? Discomfort Is the Driver of Strategic Advantage Companies don’t fall behind because they make bad decisions. They fall behind because their leaders avoid the hard ones. In high-stakes industries like FMCG, where regulatory pressure, margin compression, and shifting consumer loyalty are accelerating, comfort is dangerous. It fosters: Short-termism Decision paralysis Lack of innovation Cultural stagnation McKinsey found that organisations with a strong tolerance for ambiguity—where leaders frequently challenge their own assumptions—are 2.4x more likely to be top-quartile performers on total shareholder returns (McKinsey & Company, 2022). In other words: embracing discomfort isn’t a trait—it’s a multiplier. Let’s take an example. When COVID hit, Lion Brewery—one of Australia's largest beer producers—was forced to rethink logistics and supply overnight. But smaller craft breweries who had already diversified through direct-to-consumer models adapted faster. Why? Their founders had already been operating in discomfort. They were trained for volatility. What Discomfort-Driven Leaders Actually Do Differently You can spot these leaders. They don’t always look like the most confident in the room—but they’re always the most effective in a storm. They: Seek feedback from critics, not fans Prioritise strategy over popularity Tackle underperformance head-on—even if it means conflict Ask hard questions that slow down groupthink Regularly step out of their functional lane to challenge assumptions They also act . Not rashly—but decisively. In a recent Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD) survey, directors ranked “resilience and adaptability” as the #1 trait they now seek in new appointments—outranking experience for the first time (AICD, 2024). That’s not a trend. It’s a shift in what leadership now demands. The Real Cost of Hiring for Comfort Not hiring discomfort-driven leaders isn’t just a missed opportunity—it’s a risk. Here’s what it’s costing you: Strategic Drift: Without challenge, strategies become stale. Your team optimises yesterday’s model. Talent Exodus: Top performers disengage when they see leadership avoiding tough calls. Innovation Bottlenecks: Safe cultures don’t take smart risks. New ideas die in committee. Crisis Fragility: Leaders who haven’t been tested won’t perform when stakes are high. Bain & Company found that companies with decision-making cultures built around speed and tension—not consensus—were 95% more likely to deliver sustained value creation (Bain, 2023). Ask yourself: Is your executive team equipped for bold calls—or just built for calm waters? How to Identify Discomfort-Driven Leaders in Interviews Everyone talks a good game in interviews. But few have the scar tissue that comes from operating in real discomfort. The trick is to go beyond surface-level success stories. Here’s how: Ask Better Questions: “What’s the most uncomfortable decision you’ve made in the last 12 months—and how did it play out?” “Tell me about a time you got strong pushback from your team. What did you do?” “What’s a belief you held strongly that you’ve now abandoned?” “When have you chosen a path that was harder in the short term, but better long term?” Look for: Specificity (vagueness = theory, not lived experience) Self-awareness without self-promotion Signs of humility: they talk about learning, not just winning Evidence of risk-taking: role changes, cross-functional moves, or failed experiments Pro tip: Ask referees how the leader handles ambiguity. Not just performance. This will tell you more about how they lead under pressure. What to Do Now: Practical Actions for Executive Teams If you want to build a leadership culture of discomfort, you have to engineer it. It won’t happen organically in high-performing, risk-averse teams. Here’s how to start: Audit Your Current Team: When was the last time each leader took on something that scared them? Rethink Talent Criteria: Shift from stability and experience to adaptability and action under pressure. Redesign Development: Stretch your execs with ambiguous, cross-functional challenges—not just workshops. Model It at the Top: If the CEO isn’t embracing discomfort, no one else will. You don’t need to create chaos. You just need to stop insulating your leaders from discomfort—and start asking them to seek it. The Discomfort Dividend You can’t build a future-ready business with comfort-first leadership. The next generation of strategic advantage will come not from better processes or faster tech—but from bolder human decisions. From leaders who are willing to feel awkward, wrong, or out of their depth—because they know that’s where the value is. So next time you're hiring a leader, ask yourself: Are they looking for clarity—or ready to lead without it? Do they want the role—or are they ready for the risk that comes with it? Are they seeking comfort—or prepared to create discomfort for progress? Because in 2025, comfort is a luxury your business can’t afford .