Address

(Tower 2, Level 20, Darling Park)

201 Sussex Street

Sydney, NSW, 2000 Australia

Get in touch
Follow us
Divided opinions needn’t mean a fractured workplace
Debbie Morrison • January 28, 2021

Divided opinions needn’t mean a fractured workplace


Diversity. It’s typically one of the greatest strengths of a thriving business. Yet while differences in skills, backgrounds and opinions can often be harnessed to great effect, inevitably some issues are so fundamental they can instead create tension and conflict, turning a smooth-running workplace into anything but for Senior Executives and HR Managers.


There’s arguably no better example than the debate that surrounded the Same-Sex Marriage postal survey undertaken by the Australian Bureau of Statistics on behalf of the Australian Government in 2017. Whatever your personal stance, it begged the question: how do you best manage workplace conflicts that arise from such polarising issues?


All opinions should be heard.

In ELR Executive’s experience, a significant obstacle to an open and honest workplace occurs when staff members feel they’re being ignored – either overtly or through a perceived pressure to remain quiet – regardless of the issue in question. Being heard by senior managers and having the confidence to speak up are essential to feeling accepted and respected by both your colleagues and management. Others may disagree with your perspective, and they have every right to do so. But when you feel you aren’t being listened to, or at least granted fair opportunity to express your views in the workplace, trouble can quickly begin to brew. Previously productive team members can become disgruntled, disruptive and disillusioned. Worse still, they may just up and leave creating an even bigger HR problem.


Loud doesn’t always mean right.

Of course, there’s an important difference between being heard and ramming your opinion down the throats of everyone within earshot. The squeaky wheel may get the oil, but it doesn’t mean it’s any more deserving than the others. Senior managers and HR Departments should be alert to this. In particular, be wary of domineering staff members who are overtly vocal (or even hostile) on polarising issues or move quickly to shut down and ridicule those who share different views. It can border on workplace intimidation and potentially drive an irreparable wedge between team members that could undermine years of team building and far outlive the issue in contention itself.


Management by objective.

It’s human nature to choose sides. But effective HR management may require you to rise above personal opinions for the greater good of your team – especially when emotions are running high. Rather than becoming bogged down in ‘us versus them’ scenarios, always consider the broader business objectives and use them as your compass, just as you would normally.


​ Agreeing to disagree.

Consensus is great in theory. But when emotionally-charged issues are at play (even something as innocuous as the refereeing during the football finals could trigger problems in some workplaces!), it can be an idealistic and unattainable goal. No matter how respectful the debate may be, common ground may never be achieved between some team members. Typically, the only way to move on is to encourage the parties to respect each other’s right to hold their opinion. In other words, agreeing to disagree.


​ R-E-S-P-E-C-T.

Ultimately a harmonious workplace is a respectful one. It’s an environment where all team members feel they have the right to speak up and be heard, without fear or favour from their colleagues or managers. Achieve that and you’ll be well on your way to ensuring contentious issues such as the debate that surrounded the Same-Sex Marriage postal survey don’t weaken your team or undermine professional relationships. In fact, display strong and respectful leadership and they may even provide an opportunity to strengthen them.


By John Elliott September 30, 2024
Technology continues to be one of the biggest catalysts for change and growth. It stands to reason that Food and beverage manufacturers who fail to embrace technology risk falling behind. But here’s a question: How crucial is it for a CEO to truly understand technology and how it can transform business? Isn’t this the responsibility of the CIO? Yes. But I’m finding that technology isn’t just for the IT department anymore—CEOs and senior leaders must understand how AI, IoT, and automation can reshape everything from supply chains and customer experiences to sustainability and regulatory compliance. Perhaps it’s time to ask yourself: Do you have a CEO who just oversees operations, or one who sees tech as a strategic enabler for growth? Do they see AI, automation, and data as critical growth drivers? Do they have a history of using technology to improve operations and customer experiences? How comfortable are they relying on data and real-time analytics to make Data-Driven Decisions? Do they understand how technology decisions impact compliance and industry regulations? Do they work effectively across all departments to ensure alignment of technology with business goals? If the answer to these questions is no. It might be time to ask – Can a CEO still be effective without tech expertise? Or does a lack of it risk stalling innovation?  Contact us today for a confidential discussion on how ELR Executive can can deliver leaders that can drive your business forward.
contingent-vs-retained-recruitment/
By Debbie Morrison July 24, 2024
ELR Executive breaks down the difference between contingency and retained recruitment and why retained recruitment is ultimately the wiser choice.
Share by: