4 ways to build a culture of transparency, trust and respect between board and management
Debbie Morrison • February 8, 2023

When it comes to company culture, we often focus on the role of employees. But in fact, a key component of building a positive corporate culture is ensuring that the relationship between management and boards works smoothly. This can be particularly challenging for companies that have undergone rapid growth or are transitioning from startup to scale-up organisation. 


A CEO who has grown up in an environment where everyone worked together in one office may find it difficult to suddenly manage geographically dispersed teams that require frequent face-time with board members. On the flip side, directors may not understand their responsibilities as leaders on their own teams or within broader organisations at large. Here are some tips for building better communication between boards and management:


Management and boardroom harmony begins with communication.

Communication is a two-way street. The CEO and the Board of Directors are equally responsible for communicating with each other. This can be difficult, especially when executives and management teams are busy running the company day-to-day and board meetings are not happening regularly. However, it's important to remember that communication is a key component of any good relationship.


The first step in building trust between you and your board members is ensuring that they have access to everything they need from you so that they can have confidence in your leadership and execution abilities. They need timely updates on anything happening within the business or outside of it (e.g., new products, sales figures, customer/community sentiment). 


If necessary, make sure someone from the management team (ideally the CEO) regularly attends board meetings so there isn't any confusion about what's going on within the company at large or within specific departments/units/business lines/etc.


Encourage informal communications.

Informal communications are a great way to keep board members in the loop and an effective way to build trust and respect between executives and the board. In addition to the more formal meetings and calls with executive leaders, encourage informal communication via email, chat, phone or video conferencing so that you can pick up on any red flags early on. This will help prevent miscommunications when no one is monitoring what's happening in the organisation.


Give executives the tools and the support to thrive.

The best thing you can do to build a positive culture of transparency and trust is to provide your executives with the tools they need to do their job. This includes giving them adequate resources, as well as support when they need it. If your executive team has been struggling lately, consider rewarding them by offering training for growth and development. While this might sound expensive, remember that helping your employees grow within their roles will actually save time for everyone involved in the long run—as long as those employees are happy with their work environments.


Keep lines of communication open year-round.

While the need for transparency, trust and respect is obvious during every board review process, it’s important to keep these lines of communication open year-round. That way, you’ll be able to get a sense of how the board feels about the leadership team before any big decisions come down the pipe. Board members can also communicate when they think something needs to change or what they think could be done better so that everyone is on the same page going forward.

In addition to keeping lines of communication open throughout the year, there are some key things that boards and management should do together in order to build strong relationships:

  • Proactively make time to communicate regularly with each other

  • Be empathetic—don’t take things personally! It's not personal when someone disagrees with you; they're just giving their opinion based on their experience and expertise



When management and boards work in tandem, everyone wins.

Building a culture of transparency, trust and respect between the board and management is not only good for the organisation, but it’s also good for individual executives. The board needs to know that they can rely on the executive and management team to tell them what’s going on – good and bad. When there are no secrets between the two groups, everyone wins.

Here are four steps to get started:


  • Encourage informal communications between your management team and the board chair. There may be times when an informal conversation is more appropriate than sending out a formal update email or presentation deck.

  • Give executives the tools they need to communicate effectively with the board members who report directly to them (the CEO), as well as those who don’t report directly (audit committee members). You should also help them understand each other's roles so there are no misunderstandings about whose role it is to take actionable steps in response to issues uncovered during a review process or audit engagement.

  • Keep lines of communication open year-round -- not just when audits happen. That means communicating regularly throughout your fiscal year so people can share information openly without fear of being reprimanded or penalised if something goes wrong later down the road due simply because nobody knew about it until then.


If you want your company to thrive, then you need to foster an environment where trust and respect are the norms. This might sound like an uphill battle in some organisations, but it doesn’t have to be if you take a proactive approach that includes communicating openly with each other at every level of the organisation. By doing so, both boards and managers can work together toward a common goal: making sure that everyone on staff feels valued and appreciated for their contributions to the business.


A woman is holding two bottles of cosmetics in her hands.
By John Elliott April 21, 2025
Australia’s health, wellness, and supplements sector isn’t just growing. It’s exploding. From functional drinks to adaptogenic gummies, wellness brands have gone from niche to mainstream in record time. The industry is now worth over $5.6 billion, up from $4.7 billion in 2020 — a 19% growth in just three years. IBISWorld projects continued expansion with a CAGR of 5.3% through 2028. But behind the glossy packaging and influencer campaigns, something else is happening: the regulators have arrived. And most wellness brands? They’re underprepared. From Trend to Target The boom brought founders, fitness coaches, nutritionists, and marketing entrepreneurs into the supplement space. What many built was impressive. But what most forgot was how fast wellness moves from enthusiasm to enforcement. With more than 40 infringement notices and administrative sanctions in Q1 alone, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) strengthened enforcement of the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code in early 2024. Prominent companies were named in public. Soon after, the ACCC revised its guidelines for influencer marketing disclosures and launched a campaign against the use of pseudoscientific terminology in product marketing. TGA head Professor Anthony Lawler noted in March 2024: “We’re seeing an unacceptably high level of non-compliance, particularly around unsubstantiated therapeutic claims.” In short: credibility is the new battleground. Why Sales-First Leadership is Failing Too many brands are still led by executives whose playbooks were built on community engagement, retail hustle, and Instagram fluency. That got them early traction. But it won’t keep them compliant — or protect them from an investor exodus when the lawsuits begin. The biggest risks now are not formulation errors. They’re: Claims breaches Compliance negligence Advertising missteps Unqualified health endorsements Reputational collapse through regulatory exposure And these aren’t theoretical. The TGA pulled 197 listed medicines from the market in 2023 alone — a 42% increase on the previous year — due to non-compliant claims or sponsor breaches. What the Next Wellness Leader Looks Like This is where many boards and founders face a difficult transition. The next generation of leadership in wellness isn’t defined by hustle. It’s defined by: Deep regulatory fluency Cross-functional commercial leadership (eComm, retail, pharma, FMCG) Reputation management under pressure Ability to scale with scrutiny, not just speed The leadership profiles now needed aren’t coming out of marketing agencies — they’re coming out of pharmaceuticals, healthtech, and functional food. They’ve sat on regulatory committees. They’ve built compliance-first commercial strategies. They understand how to win trust, not just impressions. Yes, this might feel like a shift away from the founder-led energy that made these brands exciting. But it’s not about slowing down. It’s about making sure you’re still standing when the music stops. Where the Gaps Are The underlying problem isn’t just non-compliance. It's immaturity in structural leadership. The majority of wellness brands haven't developed: An accountable governance structure; a scalable compliance architecture; a risk-aware marketing culture; and any significant succession planning beyond the founder. In fact, a 2023 survey by Complementary Medicines Australia found that only 22% of wellness businesses had dedicated compliance leadership at executive level, and just 14% had formal succession plans in place. This isn’t sustainable — not at scale, and certainly not under scrutiny. Final Thought The wellness boom isn’t over. But the rules have changed. Rapid growth is no longer enough. The brands that win from here will be those with: A compliance culture baked in Leadership teams built for complexity A board that sees regulation not as a barrier, but a brand advantage Those who don’t? They could be one audit away from crisis.
A Farmer walking through a barn, using a laptop with cows eating hay nearby.
By John Elliott April 17, 2025
Australia’s meat sector is facing a leadership vacuum. Explore the hidden crisis behind staffing, succession, and ESG risk in food manufacturing.