Address

(Tower 2, Level 20, Darling Park)

201 Sussex Street

Sydney, NSW, 2000 Australia

Get in touch
Follow us
A Resume that Sells
Debbie Morrison • September 22, 2021

A Resume that Sells



There’s something that distinguishes a good resume from a bad one (and can turn a good resume into a great one). While it’s fairly simple in theory, it can be difficult in practice because it involves thinking about your resume in a fundamentally different way than you may be used to.

 

The concept is this: your resume is a sales document, not a biography.

 

I’ll lay out what this means for your resume momentarily. But first – for the non-salespeople reading – let me give you a crash course in sales theory. (If you are in sales, bear with me and keep reading, because the most difficult product to sell is yourself, and this will help you do that.)

 

In sales, one can sell using the features of a product or service, or its benefits. While most people in sales would agree that the more important of the two is benefits, it’s not an either/or question. Both are important. It’s just that the features are only important to the extent that they give the buyer the benefit they’re looking for.

 

By way of example, think about the last time you bought a car. If you did your research, you probably looked at the features: seating and cargo capacity, safety features, fuel economy, comfort and convenience accessories. But was that really what you were buying? I’d bet not. You were interested in interior room... because you were thinking about the times you’d have passengers and stuff along for the ride. You were interested in safety... because if an accident happens, you want to protect yourself and the people with you. You’re interested in the ‘bells and whistles’... because they make long drives more comfortable (and sure, because some of them are just fun to have).

 

The same holds true for any major purchase. You want to know the specs of the smartphone you’re buying, but only because they allow you to do the things you need and want to do with that device. You may look at the picture and sound quality of a big screen TV, but what you’re really thinking about is the quality of the movie-night experiences you’ll have with friends and family.

 

Far too many people write their resumes as they’d write a spec sheet for a car, a phone, or a TV. Your work experiences, the responsibilities you’ve held in various roles; those are your ‘features’. Not that they’re not important – they are. But only to the extent that they demonstrate the benefits you’ll bring to a prospective employer. A comprehensive list of tasks and duties may accurately reflect what you did in your previous jobs, but it doesn’t do much to sell you as a potential new hire.

 

When writing or updating your resume, think first like a salesperson. What is the ‘customer’ (in this case, a potential employer) really looking for? What value are they hoping to get from bringing on someone new? What benefit will they be looking for you to provide? In some cases, the answer to these questions are fairly easy. Hiring a new salesperson should generate more revenue. Hiring a new manager for a team should mean better results from the people on that team, and perhaps less staff turnover.

 

Every part of your resume can be viewed through that lens. When you describe a previous job, you don’t have a ‘biographical responsibility’ to mention every single thing you did in that role. Selling yourself means focusing in on the aspects of your work that brought the most value to your previous employer and are of most relevance to your next employer; providing more detail about those, and less about things that are less directly related.

 

This also means that at a certain point in your career, you can start leaving some things off entirely. If you’ve been in your field for about ten years or more, for example, you no longer need to include much detail about jobs you held previously that aren’t related to your career, or even to include those jobs at all. (Of course, this doesn’t mean you can’t or shouldn’t include jobs you held years ago, it just means you should only include the details about them that help to sell you as a candidate, and the value you bring to a company.)

 

Your academic background – even if it’s not related to your current career – should usually be included because attaining a degree or a certification shows intelligence, commitment, and a willingness to work hard. That said, any additional continuing education courses only need to be included if they’re directly tied to the value you would bring to a new employer.

 

This shift to a sales mindset is also why tracking and listing specific achievements on your resume is so important. Unlike a list of responsibilities, accomplishments – particularly those that are quantifiable, expressed in percentages, dollar figures and the like – underscore how you benefited your previous employers. Which, in turn, helps a prospective employer see how you’d benefit them.

 

In the end, you may end up with a resume that has less quantity, but that’s fine: quality is what counts. Getting rid of less relevant content that doesn’t sell the benefit you’d offer as a new hire is decluttering. The reader is left with the content that really shows what you can do for them.

 

Does your resume read more like a biography, or like a sales pitch? If you’re not sure how to approach this, we’d be happy to provide some pointers. Send us your resume today, and let us help make sure it sells you as well as your experience deserves.


By John Elliott March 24, 2025
Emotional intelligence is one of the most valued traits in executive leadership today.  It’s also one of the most misunderstood. In interviews, every candidate knows how to speak about empathy, collaboration, and “bringing people on the journey.” But when does that emotional intelligence start to look more like emotional avoidance? If you’re hiring into a senior role in consumer goods or food and beverage manufacturing, this distinction matters. Hiring someone who avoids hard conversations risks building a culture that performs around problems, not through them. The leaders delivering the best outcomes in 2025 understand how to build trust and rapport — without dodging the accountability that comes with real leadership. Emotional Intelligence: What It Gets Right In complex, fast-paced industries like FMCG and food production, leaders need more than technical expertise. They must influence, de-escalate tension, manage change, and build alignment across functions. That’s where emotional intelligence shines. High-EQ leaders are more likely to: Retain talent through strong, trust-based relationships Remain composed in high-stakes environments Reduce conflict through proactive, clear communication Drive psychological safety while still pushing for results The research backs this up. According to a 2024 EHL Insights report , emotionally intelligent leaders improve employee satisfaction, engagement, and collaboration — all essential in manufacturing settings where coordination between departments is critical. But there’s a fine line between emotional intelligence and emotional overcorrection. When Emotional Intelligence Becomes Emotional Avoidance The risk is subtle: leaders who over-index on empathy may begin to avoid the discomfort of conflict altogether. That looks like: Letting underperformance linger to “keep the peace” Over-relying on collaboration instead of making firm decisions Avoiding direct feedback Prioritising harmony at the expense of clarity A 2024 Forbes article described how emotionally avoidant leaders — despite good intentions — often undermine the very culture they’re trying to protect. Accountability erodes, decisions slow down, and high performers become disengaged. We’ve seen this play out in executive search mandates across the sector. On paper, a candidate may appear ideal: emotionally intelligent, highly personable, well-liked. But dig deeper, and a pattern emerges — reluctance to address performance issues, vague language around past team challenges, and a track record of avoiding direct confrontation. That’s not emotional intelligence. That’s fear, dressed as empathy. Emotional Intelligence Is a Must — But It’s Not the Full Picture More organisations are making emotional intelligence a key leadership trait in hiring — and for good reason. In high-change environments, emotionally intelligent leaders: Build trust across teams quickly Navigate transformation without losing people along the way Stay composed under pressure Handle interpersonal complexity with clarity But some of the most costly mis-hires we see come from leaders who present as highly empathetic, but struggle to lead through tension. Not because they lack EQ — but because they confuse it with keeping everyone comfortable. The difference? The leaders delivering the best outcomes in 2024 and 2025 are doing both: Holding people accountable while building engagement Delivering hard feedback without defensiveness Balancing calm with courage These are the leaders who retain high performers, protect standards, and still earn trust across the business. Hiring Outcomes Are Better When EQ Is Tested in Context The most effective hiring processes we’re seeing in the market today aren’t just asking, “Is this leader emotionally intelligent?” They’re asking: Can this person hold accountability and empathy at the same time? Have they delivered under pressure without letting performance slide? Do they create safe cultures that are also high-performing? The difference in outcomes is clear: More resilient leadership teams Better cultural fit Fewer surprises post-placement What to Look for in Executive Interviews Hiring emotionally intelligent leaders isn’t just about what they say — it’s about how they’ve acted in real moments of challenge. The most effective hiring panels are getting beyond rehearsed narratives by asking sharper questions: To probe real emotional intelligence: “Tell me about a time you had to lead a team through a change that wasn’t popular.” “How do you approach a conversation when someone on your team is underperforming?” “Describe a time you disagreed with your CEO or board. What did you do?” Watch for signals: Are they clear and specific, or vague and diplomatic? Do they show respect and resolve? Do they accept responsibility, or redirect it elsewhere? In reference checks, ask: “How did they manage pressure or uncertainty?” “Were they able to deliver difficult feedback directly?” “Did they avoid difficult decisions in the name of team cohesion?” When emotional intelligence is genuine, it shows up in results — not just relationships. Why This Matters Now Organisations in the consumer goods and food manufacturing sectors are undergoing constant disruption — from digitisation to regulatory shifts to cost pressures. In this environment, leadership soft skills aren’t optional. But it’s not enough to hire likeable leaders. The ones delivering real impact are those who bring empathy and edge. They’re able to sit with discomfort, hold the mirror up, and still bring people with them. That’s what true emotional intelligence looks like in 2025. So when you’re hiring your next senior leader, don’t just ask if they care. Ask if they can care and confront — with courage, with clarity, and with conviction. Because your culture doesn’t need more harmony. It needs more truth.
By John Elliott March 18, 2025
AI is Changing Business—So Must Its Leaders
Share by: